| |
All those poets out there hoping to have their first
collections published in a dwindling poetry market what are their
prospects?
Neil Astley, editor of Bloodaxe Books, says: We will not take on
any books by new authors for the next three years, although we will publish
from our backlog one first collection this year and three next year. The
reason for this policy is the alarming decline in poetry sales through
bookshops, resulting from the dumbing-down of the UK book trade following
the demise of the Net Book Trade Agreement and the Waterstones takeover
of Dillons. That chain now tells publishers that contemporary poetry will
be stocked only if they give Waterstones a 50% discount, which is
unviable. The range of poetry titles stocked is progressively reduced,
and slower-selling titles are often returned even before reviews appear.
Waterstones will not stock Bloodaxes first collections.
Clare Brown, director of the Poetry Book Society, agrees: First
collections are the first casualty in a shrinking poetry market, especially
when the restrictive buying policies of Waterstones and the other
chain bookshops make it difficult to persuade a retailers buyers
to stock backlist titles by even well known writers. Another point is
that too many poetry books are published the market is flooded
by work which really shouldnt be in book form. It might be time
to consider publishing on the web where thousands could read the work
and the financial investment is small. The PBS is currently investigating
ways of "growing the market" for poetry, ensuring that bookshops
carry a representative selection across the full range of publishers.
Janet Fisher, at Smith/Doorstop, reports that 14 smaller independent
poetry publishers are launching a syndicate, INPRESS, this summer to represent
them with a distributor and a sales-force company to service key retail
accounts.
Smith/Doorstop published two first collections this year and aims for
the same next year. Faber has not published a first collection since 1996.
Seren plans one this year and two next year, Cape has one this year and
probably one next year, Enitharmon will publish four in 2003, Carcanet
has two this year, Anvil aims at two a year, Arc one or two a year, and
Picador has published half a dozen over recent years and a couple more
are planned.
At the Arts Council of England, Gary McKeone, director of literature,
and John Hampson, senior literature officer, said in a recent interview
that ACE had invested £100,000 annually to subsidize Signature,
a company of book sales representatives. That subsidy ceased this year
when Signature stopped selling on behalf of smaller poetry presses. They
said they are looking at ways in which poetry distribution might
be addressed imaginatively without relying solely on the high street bookshop.
A pilot project is already looking at distribution through the public
library network, bearing in mind that 58% of the population has a library
card. Noting that ACE funds poetry publishers websites, it
was suggested poets should not restrict their focus to first collections,
but also include the Internet, poetry magazines, small-scale private publishing
and the anthologies of work by new poets such as those published by Anvil
and Carcanet. They predict that while selling poetry books on the Internet
and by mail order would not be a substitute for bookshops, publishers
will certainly use these sales channels more in the future.
Having gathered the research reported here, I believe that the marketing
of contemporary poetry is in serious trouble. The arts councils and regional
arts boards of Britain have evidently been successful in encouraging more
people to write poetry, but unfortunately there is a concomitant failure
to stimulate increased purchases of contemporary poetry. Thats because
theres been relatively little well-directed effort to achieve this
difficult task except for the outstanding and most professional
marketing and direct sales work by the Poetry Book Society, an organization
funded, of course, by the Arts Council. I suggest its also time
to form a wholesaler company, perhaps funded jointly by poetry publishers
and the Arts Council, which will sell contemporary poetry into bookshop
chains and independent bookshops on terms which are not draconian. Finally,
I hope that the arts councils of Britain will, singly or in a group action,
retain the services of a professional marketing consultancy to advise
on and guide this work.
|