|
|
||
| First
Prize Grevel Lindop
Read the poem > |
Judge's Report
Then I began to wonder about the poems in the bigger pile. Why had those poems not worked for me? The vast majority used predictable subject matter, their language and form lacked energy and surprise, and were poems I felt I'd read many times before. Some poems contained beautiful individual lines, and others fascinating ideas and descriptions, but in these and other cases the poems as a whole didn't catch fire. Telling images were left high and dry among tired verbal processes, and ideas were not propelled by vivid development into a fully realized poem. It occurred to me that many of the entrants could benefit by extending the range of their poetry reading, to explore more fully contemporary and classic poetry, both in English and in translation. Many writers needed to widen and deepen their wordhoard and poetry sensibility. As Christine Pugh says in the June 05 issue of Poetry, ‘Might it be that what is missing in the work of some younger poets is not “experience” at all, but reading that is deep enough to effect changes in the self?’ Recently I was in Andalucia, walking in the high sierras. We saw a new man-made waterfall. To create this, water had been chanelled along conduits through the mountains from a lagoon near the summits, and then poured down in this waterfall to feed the Guadalquivir, a river in danger of drying up. This is called ‘stream supply’. Think of this as metaphor for writing poetry. We need to read waterfalls of poetry, in order to prevent imaginative drought. I returned to my 15-poem shortlist. The winner declared itself swiftly, and I gradually winnowed the rest till I had two other winners and four commendations. These seven poems offer access to what Yeats called ‘the poet's secret working mind’. Each poem relished the imagination as a liberating agent, was ambitious in subject and language, and each created what Lorca saw as ‘the poetic fact’, when everything the reader needs to experience the poem is contained within it. These poems create reality as well as observing it, and they have sensuous intelligence, can be smelled, tasted, felt. This brings me to the three main prize-winners. ‘The Chimney’ (third prize) by Barbara Cumbers has four long stanzas composed of long lines powerfully depicting a landscape of water, trees, hilltops, and at the epicentre of the poem, an old abandoned industrial chimney. The poet asks us to ‘follow the natural curvature of things’ and explores the four elements of earth, air, fire and water. I like the severity of the poem, avoiding any eco sentimentality; I note its restraint, through which emotion is conveyed in a measured calm voice. In ‘Paradise Lost at the Lipstick Factory’ by Chris Considine (second prize), John Milton and cosmetics productively coincide. I loved the immediacy of beginning the poem with a question, and in 11 swift moving sharp-eyed and sharp-eared couplets, the poem evokes the student in a vacation job at a lipstick factory, reading Paradise Lost in her lunchbreak. She wonders if she'd have learned more about life from talking with her co-workers, and speculates about the uses of art, about what constitutes ‘real life’. The ‘gates of purifying flame’ through which the lipsticks pass on the conveyor belt mirror the fiery gates through which Eve was expelled from Eden — a very striking trope. In the poem that wins the first prize, ‘A Dozen Red Roses’, Grevel Lindop sets himself the hard task of taking the familiar romantic image of a dozen red roses, and making it new. Written in one stanza, the poem certainly achieves that. Each rose represents a different aspect of a love affair. I loved the clarity and precision with which each rose is revealed. After nine vivid examples of what each rose stands for (red wine, kisses, the heart, lipsticks, left nipple, right nipple, for the times the lovers slept apart, perfumes, poems) we come to the tenth rose which is time — making a beautiful and skilful turn in the poem, centring the lovers in time. The conclusion is a surprise. We come to the 13th rose, the invisible rose that though ‘ominous’ is also an ‘offering to the furies’, in the hope that this love will last. It is also, of course, an echo and refutation of Blake’s ‘O Rose, thou art sick’, and maybe a homage to the lines Rilke wrote for his own epitaph: ‘Rose, oh the pure contradiction, delight / of being no one's sleep under so many lids.’
|
|
| Second Prize
Chris Considine
|
||
| Third Prize
Barbara Cumbers
Read the poem > |
||
| Commended Elizabeth Gowing
Robert Saxton
Christopher Southgate
Victor Tapner
|
||
| The prizes were awarded and the poems read at our Autumn Launch on Wednesday 19th October, at the Gallery at Foyles, 2nd floor, 113-119 Charing Cross Road, London WC2H. This was Poetry London's sixth Competition. Finally, Poetry London is very grateful to all the people who entered the Competition.
|
||